Kathy Jaffari, Naz Jalali, and Noah Schottenbauer discuss the SEC’s recent no-action letter approving ExxonMobil’s proposed retail voting program, marking a historic shift in policy, in The Legal Intelligencer. This program allows retail shareholders to set standing voting instructions (SVIs), enabling their shares to be automatically voted in line with board recommendations. Previously prohibited, SVIs are now permitted under specific conditions, aligning with SEC Chair Paul Atkin’s broader goal of democratizing capital markets. Exxon’s program includes safeguards such as annual reminders, opt-out rights, and continued access to proxy materials, ensuring compliance with Rule 14a-4(d) and promoting informed participation. The SEC’s approval is contingent on six key elements, including universal availability and full disclosure, which other companies must replicate to avoid enforcement risks.

Despite the potential to boost retail shareholder engagement, the program raises legal and strategic concerns. State laws vary on proxy validity, and it’s unclear how courts will interpret SVIs under these frameworks. Additionally, not all issuers may benefit equally – companies with low retail ownership might find the costs outweigh the advantages. While supporters argue the program simplifies voting and amplifies retail voices, critics warn it could entrench management power and suppress nuanced shareholder input. These concerns have led to legal challenges, including a class action in New Jersey alleging fiduciary breaches. Issuers considering similar programs must weigh legal compliance, shareholder demographics, and stakeholder reactions before proceeding.

To read more, click here. (subscription required)